Rabu, 25 April 2012

5th Assignment of Topic in Applied Linguistics


Maulina Adzkiyah
2201409033
TiAL Study Group 405-406

Systemic-Functional Linguistics

Definition
Systemic-Functional Linguistics can be defined as the relationship between language and its functions in social settings. In systemic-functional linguistics (SFL), three strata make up the linguistic system: meaning (semantics), sound (phonology), and wording or lexicogrammar (syntax, morphology, and lexis). SFL treats grammar as meaning-making resource and insists on the interrelation of form and meaning.
In other words, SFL is a theory of language centered on the notion of language function. SFL accounts for the syntactic structure of language. Its function of language as central (what language does, and how it does it), in preference to more structural approaches, which place the elements of language and their combination as central. SFL starts at social context, and looks at how language both acts upon, and is constrained by, this social context.

Theory
Halliday (1985) wrote in “The value of a theory” that “lies in the use that can be made of it, and I have always considered a theory of language to be essentially consumer oriented”. This perspective from the major figure of Systemic-Functional linguistics is refreshing to applied linguists who grew up on a diet of linguist oriented structural transformations. It can be said that Systemic-Functional (SF) theory views language as a social semiotic a resource people use to accomplish their purpose by expressing meanings in context.
According to Halliday (1975), language has developed in response to three kinds of social-functional 'needs.' The first is to be able to construe experience in terms of what is going on around us and inside us. The second is to interact with the social world by negotiating social roles and attitudes. The third and final need is to be able to create messages with which we can package our meanings in terms of what is New or Given, and in terms of what the starting point for our message is, commonly referred to as the Theme. Halliday (1978) calls these language functions metafunctions, and refers to them as ideational, interpersonal and textual respectively.

History of systemic
SFL grew out of the work of JR Firth, a British linguist of the 30s, 40s, and 50s, but was mainly developed by his student MAK Halliday. He developed the theory in the early sixties (seminal paper, Halliday 1961), based in England, and moved to Australia in the Seventies, establishing the department of linguistics at the University of Sydney. Through his teaching there, SFL has spread to a number of institutions throughout Australia, and around the world. Australian Systemics is especially influential in areas of language education.

Child language development
Some of Halliday's early work involved the study of his son's developing language abilities. This study in fact has had a substantial influence on the present systemic model of adult language, particularly in regard to the metafunctions. This work has been followed by other child language development work, especially that of Clare Painter. Ruqaia Hasan has also performed studies of interactions between children and mothers.

Systemic and computation
SFL has been prominent in computational linguistics, especially in Natural Language Generation (NLG). Penman, an NLG system started at Information Sciences Institute in 1980, is one of the three main such systems, and has influenced much of the work in the field. John Bateman (currently in Bremen, Germany) has extended this system into a multilingual text generator, KPML. Robin Fawcett in Cardiff have developed another systemic generator, called Genesys. Mick O'Donnell has developed yet another system, called WAG. Numerous other systems have been built using Systemic grammar, either in whole or in part.

Levels of social context
1.      Field of discourse
2.      Language bridges from the cultural meanings of social context
3.      Semantics
4.      Lexicogrammar
5.      Ideational meaning
6.      Interpersonal meaning
7.      Textual meaning

Rabu, 18 April 2012

4th Assignment of Topics in Applied Linguistics: DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Maulina Adzkiyah (2201409033/ 405-406)

DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Definition of DA
Is it text or discourse analysis? It is not easy to define them actually. In everyday popular use, it might be said that the term text is restricted to written language, while discourse is restricted to spoken language. However, modern Linguistics has introduces a concept of text that includes every type of utterance; therefore, a text may be a magazine article, a television interview, a conversation or a cooking recipe. According to De Beaugrande and Dressler (1981) text and communicative event must satisfy its seven criteria. They are Cohesion, Coherence, Intentionality, Acceptability, Informativity, Situationality, and Intertextuality.
Originally, the word “discourse’ comes from Latin “discursus” which denoted “conversation, speech”. Here are some definitions about Discourse Analysis (DA):
1.      Discourse analysis can be characterized as a way of approaching and thinking about a problem.
2.      Discourse analysis (DA), or discourse studies, is a general term for a number of approaches to analyzing written, spoken, signed language use or any significant semiotic event.
3.      Discourse analysis is a qualitative method that has been adopted and developed by social constructionists. Although discourse analysis can and is used by a handful of cognitive psychologists, it is based on a view that is largely anti-scientific, though not anti-research.
4.      Slembrouck points out the ambiguity of the term discourse analysis and provides another broad definition:
The term discourse analysis is very ambiguous. I will use it in this book to refer mainly to the linguistic analysis of naturally occurring connected speech or written discourse. Roughly speaking, it refers to attempts to study the organisation of language above the sentence or above the clause, and therefore to study larger linguistic units, such as conversational exchanges or written texts. It follows that discourse analysis is also concerned with language use in social contexts, and in particular with interaction or dialogue between speakers. (2005:1)

Uses of DA
The contribution of the postmodern Discourse Analysis is the application of critical thought to social situations and the unveiling of hidden (or not so hidden) politics within the socially dominant as well as all other discourses (interpretations of the world, belief systems, etc.). Discourse Analysis can be applied to any text, that is, to any problem or situation. Since Discourse Analysis is basically and interpretative and deconstructing reading, there are no specific guidelines to follow. But, all purpose of DA is not to provide definite answers, but to expand our personal horizons and make us realize our own shortcomings and unacknowledged agendas/ motivations – as well as that of others.

Types of DA
There are numerous "types" or theories of Discourse Analysis. Jacques Derrida's "Deconstruction" would be one; so would Michel Foucault's Genealogy and social criticism and analysis of the uses of discourse to exercise power (such as his analysis of how "Knowledge" is created in our societies and with what purpose or effect).

Approaches to DA
a.      Speech Act Theory
It is a logico-philosophic perspective on conversational organization focusing on interpretation rather than the production of utterances in discourse.
b.      Interactional Sociolinguistics
It centrally concerned with the importance of context in the production and interpretation of discourse.
c.       Ethnography of Communication
The ethnographic framework has led to broader notions of communicative competence.
d.      Pragmatics
It formulates conversational behavior in terms of general “principles” rather than rules.
It also provides means of characterizing different varieties of conversation, e.g. in interactions, one can deliberately try to provocative or consensual.
e.       Conversational Analysis
CA is a branch of ethnomethodology.  Garfinkel (sociologist) concern: to understand how social members make sense of everyday life.
f.       Variation Analysis
Labov & Waletzky (1967) argue that fundamental narrative structures are evident in spoken narratives of personal experience.
g.      SFL

Issues of Reliability and Validity
Discourse or Critical Analysis always remains a matter of interpretation. As there is no hard data provided through discourse analysis, the reliability and the validity of one's research/findings depends on the force and logic of one's arguments. Even the best constructed arguments are subject to their own deconstructive reading and counter-interpretations. The validity of critical analysis is, therefore, dependent on the quality of the rhetoric. Despite this fact, well-founded arguments remain authoritative over time and have concrete applications.

Advantages and Disadvantages
Discourse Analysis and critical thinking is applicable to every situation and every subject. The new perspective provided by discourse analysis allows personal growth and a high level of creative fulfillment. No technology or funds are necessary and authoritative discourse analysis can lead to fundamental changes in the practices of an institution, the profession, and society as a whole. However, Discourse Analysis does not provide definite answers; it is not a "hard" science, but an insight/knowledge based on continuous debate and argumentation.

References

Alba, Laura – Juez. 2009. Perspective on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Fulcher, Eamon. 2012. What is Discourse Analysis? Downloaded at http://www.eamonfulcher.com/discourse_analysis.html (April 18, 2012)
_____.____. Discourse Analysis. Downloaded at http://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~palmquis/courses/discourse.htm (April 18, 2012)
_____. 2012. Discourse Analysis. Downloaded at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourse_analysis (April 18, 2012)
Wisniewski, Kamil. 2006. Discourse Analysis. Downloaded at http://www.tlumaczenia-angielski.info/linguistics/discourse.htm (April 18, 2012)




Rabu, 11 April 2012

3rd Assignment of Topics in Applied Linguistics: COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE

Maulina Adzkiyah
2201409033
Study Group 405-406

Communicative Competence

Communicative competence can be defined as the capacity of being able to use the language for meaningful communication. The idea of communicative competence was given by Dell Hymes (1972). His original idea was that speakers of a language have to have more than grammatical competence in order to be able to communicative effectively in a language; they also need to know how language is used by members of a speech community to accomplish their purposes.
Communicative competence has four types according to Hymes. They are:
a.       What is formally possible
b.      What is feasible
c.       What is social meaning or value of a given utterance
d.      What actually occur
Canale and Swain (1980) defined communicative competence in the context of second language teaching. Their view of communicative competence is: “a synthesis of knowledge of basic grammatical principles, knowledge of how language is used in social setting to perform communicative functions, and knowledge of how utterance and communicative functions can be combined according to principles of discourse”.
 There are some language knowledge aspects including in the communicative competence. They are described as follows:
1.      Knowing how to use language for a range of different purposes and functions.
2.      Knowing how to vary our use of language according to the setting and the participants (e.g. knowing when to use formal or informal speech or when to use language appropriately for written as opposed to spoken communication).
3.      Knowing how to produce and understand different types of texts (e.g. narratives, reports, interviews, conversations).
4.      Knowing how to maintain communication despite having limitations in one’s language knowledge (e.g. through using different kinds of communication strategies).
Compared to grammatical competence that focuses on text construction, communicative competence can be said as the realization of the capacity of grammatical competence. It is where the communicative competence used in the field of real communication through either spoken or written.


References


Yano, Yasukata. Communicative Competence and English as an International Language. Waseda University

_____. Historical Overview of the Development of the Notion of “Communicative Competence”. Downloaded at http://www.ne.jp/asahi/kurazumi/peon/ccmodel.html (April 11, 2012)

Richard, Jack C. Communicative Language Teaching Today. Downloaded at http://www.professorjackrichards.com/pdfs/communicative-language-teaching-today-v2.pdf (March 29, 2012)

Rabu, 04 April 2012

2nd Assignment: Historical Background of English Language Teaching

Maulina Adzkiyah
2201409033
TiAL Study Group 405-406
2nd Assignment

Historical Background of English Language Teaching

The globalization which is increasing has created a large need for people in the world either in the work world or education world who can communicate in multiple languages. The uses of common languages are in such area of business, technology, media, science, tourism, and many others. As one of the international languages, English has its own popularity to be learnt by people around the world. For such of those reasons, learning English either as a second language or foreign become more important to be done. So, let’s take a look first on the historical background of English Language Teaching.
Language teaching in the last 50 years is divided into three phases. They are traditional approaches (up to the late 1960s), classic communicative language teaching (1970s to 1990s), and current communicative language teaching (late 1990s to the present). Let’s see the explanation of those three phases one by one.

·         Traditional Approaches (up to late 1960s)

Latin which was believed to develop intellectual abilities was the popular language in Europe in the 16th century. The main objectives of learning this language were to understand the classical text, grammar of Latin and translation. By the time went on, Latin was disappeared from a spoken language. This was the opportunity for English to reach its popularity. But, the problem was that English was taught using the same way as Latin. Grammar Translation Method was the method used in this phase. The teaching was focused on the grammar of English. Instead of inductive approach, deductive approach was used to teach grammar. That was by presenting the students with the grammar rule and then let them practice using it. The more surprising one was the belief that grammar could be learnt through direct instruction and a methodology that made much use in repetitive practice and drilling.
Memorization of the words was very important. The techniques used in teaching activity were memorization of dialogue, question and answer practice, substitution drills, and various forms of guided speaking and writing practice. It was assumed that students’ errors would quickly become a permanent part of the learner’s speech so a great attention to accurate pronunciation and grammar was stressed from the beginning stages of language learning.
The methodologies include:
1.      Audiolingualism (in North America) (also known as the Aural - Oral Method)
2.      The Structural-Situaltional Approach in the UK (also known as Situational Language Teaching)
Procedures observed in audio lingual lesson.
a.       Students first hear a model dialogue.
b.      The dialogue is adapted into students’ interest or situation through changing certain keywords or phrases.
c.       Drills are done based on certain key structures.
d.      Students may refer to their textbook.
e.       Follow-up activities.
3.      P-P-P (Presentation – Practice - Production) Methodology.
Grammar – based methodologies such as P-P-P, under the influence of CLT theory, have given way to functional and skill – based teaching, and accuracy activities such as drill and grammar practice have been replaced by fluency activities based on interactive small – group work. This led to the emergence of a ‘fluency-first’ pedagogy (Brumfit 1984) in which students’ grammar needs are determined on the basis of performance on fluency tasks rather than predetermined by a grammatical syllabus.

·         Classic Communicative Language Teaching (1970s to 1990s)

The Audiolingualism and Structural – Situational Approach were out of date in the 1970s. But then the reaction to traditional language approaches began and soon spread around the world. Using language to communicate communicatively was actually the main purpose of learning a second or foreign language. So, what was needed to reach gain this purpose was communicative competence. This was a broader concept that that of grammatical competence included what to say and how to say it appropriately based on the situation, the participants and their roles and intentions. The notion of communicative competence was developed within the discipline of linguistics (or more accurately, the sub-discipline of sociolinguistics).
The idea of CLT (Communicative Language Teaching) created a great deal of enthusiasm and excitement when it first appeared. This idea had some principles such as language was for expression of meaning and its primary function was interaction and communication. By this idea, language teaching started to be different since teachers begin to rethink their teaching method, syllabus, and material learning. There are some aspects that should be identified by the syllabus so that communicative competence could be developed. These are the aspects:
1.      Purpose
2.      Setting
3.      Role
4.      Communicative events
5.      Language functions
6.      Notions
7.      Discourse and rhetorical skills
8.      Variety
9.      Grammatical content
10.  Lexical content
These are the two important directions in the 1970s and 1980s proposals for a communicative syllabus, and the ESP movement.
a.      Proposals for a communicative syllabus.
ü  A skills-based syllabus: this focuses on the four skills of listening, speaking, reading, and writing, and breaks each skill down into its component micro skills.
ü  A functional syllabus: this is organized according to the functions the learner should be able to carry out in English.
b.      English for Specific Purposes (ESP)
Many learners needed English in order to use it in specific occupational or educational settings. It would be more efficient if they were taught using certain or specific kinds of language and communicative skills that were different with the usual one. The differences might include differences in vocabulary choice, grammar, kinds of texts commonly occurring, functions, and the need for particular skills.
Implications for methodology

The new communicative approach to teaching prompted a rethinking of classroom teaching methodology. There were arguments that learners learn a language through the process of communication in it, and that communication is meaningful to the learner provides a better opportunity for learning than through a grammar – based approach.
These were the important principles of CLT at that time:
1.      Real communication as the focus of learning
2.      Provide opportunities to experiment and trying out
3.      Tolerance on learners’ errors
4.      Link four language skills together
5.      Let students induce discover grammar rules
If we want to apply those principles, new classroom techniques and activities were needed.


REFERENCES

Kesuma, Barlin. 2011. A Brief History of English Language Teaching. Downloaded at http://englishteachingmethod.blogspot.com/2011/02/brief-history-of-english-language.html (March 29, 2012).
Wikipedia. Language Education. Downloaded at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_education (March 29, 2012)
Richard, Jack C. Communicative Language Teaching Today. Downloaded at http://www.professorjackrichards.com/pdfs/communicative-language-teaching-today-v2.pdf (March 29, 2012)

Minggu, 01 April 2012

Difficult

When I see your eyes
I find sunrise
When I listen to your words
I think I have the world
Here I find someone
Who never ask me to compete
Here I find the one
Who makes me feel complete
I want you to believe in me
Because I can make you see
That I’m the one who’ll stay
If she walks away
Dreaming, I must be dreaming
Yes, I’m waiting
But it seems that you are fading
I dream the hours away
I wonder everyday
Want you to stay
Can we walk it through?
Since you have the one
And I have mine
It isn’t our fault
That we are difficult
It isn’t our sin
That this forbidden love begins